Appeal No. 95-4010
Application 08/082,338
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants
and the Examiner, reference is made to the briefs and answers 2 3
for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 2
through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
2Appellants filed an appeal brief on November 10, 1994.
We will refer to this appeal brief as simply the brief.
Appellants filed a reply appeal brief on March 20, 1995. We
will refer to this reply appeal brief as the reply brief. The
Examiner responded to the reply brief with an Examiner's
answer mailed April 21, 1995, and thereby entered and consid-
ered the reply brief. Appellants filed a second reply appeal
brief on May 12, 1995. We will refer to this reply appeal
brief as the second reply brief. The Examiner stated in the
Examiner’s letter, mailed May 26, 1995, that the second reply
brief has been entered and considered but no further response
by the Examiner is deemed necessary.
3The Examiner responded to the brief with an Examiner's
answer, mailed February 27, 1995. We will refer to the Exam-
iner's answer as simply the answer. The Examiner responded to
the reply brief with a supplemental Examiner's answer, mailed
April 21, 1995. We will refer to the supplemental Examiner's
answer as simply the supplemental answer. The Examiner re-
sponded to the second reply brief with a letter, mailed May
26, 1995, so noting that the supplemental reply brief has been
entered and considered. The Examiner offered no other re-
sponse.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007