Ex parte AIHARA et al. - Page 12




             Appeal No. 95-4830                                                                                   
             Application 07/899,361                                                                               


             experiment, has a tristable S*(3) phase upon heating.  Thus,                                         
             the evidence of record taken as a whole does not show that a                                         
             compound within the scope of Suzuki, which has an external                                           
             ester which is the reverse of that of the compound in                                                
             Experiment 4 of the declaration, has no tristable S*(3) phase                                        
             upon heating.                                                                                        


                    Fourth, the comparisons in the declaration are not                                            
             commensurate in scope with appellants’ claims.  Only compounds                                       
             with an R  having 8 or 10 carbon atoms and an R  having 61                                            2                                        
             carbon atoms are used in the comparisons, whereas appellants’                                        
             claims encompass R  having 5-18 carbon atoms and R  having 6-161                                       2                                  
             carbon atoms, and Suzuki discloses R  having 1-20 carbon atoms                                       
                                                             1                                                    
             and R  having 4-14 carbon atoms (col. 2, lines 34-44).  See                                          
                    2                                                                                             
             Grasselli, 713 F.2d at 743, 218 USPQ at 778; Clemens, 622 F.2d                                       
             at 1035, 206 USPQ at 296.  Appellants provide no explanation                                         
             as to why the great number of compounds encompassed by                                               
             appellant’s claims would behave as a class in the same manner                                        
             as the particular compounds tested.  See Lindner, 457 F.2d at                                        
             508, 173 USPQ at 358; Susi, 440 F.2d at 445-46, 169 USPQ at                                          


                                                      -12-12                                                      





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007