Ex parte WATTS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-2715                                                          
          Application No. 08/306,797                                                  


               This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                    
          finally rejecting claims 1-7, which constitute all of the                   
          claims of record in the application.                                        
               The appellants’ invention is directed to a method and                  
          apparatus for treating a shirred food casing, and to the                    
          shirred food casing.  The subject matter before us on appeal                
          is illustrated by reference to claim 1, which reads as                      
          follows:                                                                    
               1. A method for treating a shirred food casing strand,                 
          having a diameter, a circumference, a longitudinal axis, a                  
          length, an external surface and a hollow bore along at least a              
          portion of said longitudinal axis, which comprises providing                
          an opening space between at least three parallel rollers which              
          space is large enough to insert the strand, closing the space               
          so that all three rollers contact the strand and smoothing                  
          said exterior surface by rolling said strand between the at                 
          least three rollers, all of which simultaneously contact said               
          external surface at different lines of contact along the                    
          entire length of the strand.                                                

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The references relied upon by the examiner to support the              
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Kostner et al. (Kostner)           3,798,302                Mar.            
          19, 1974                                                                    
          Moret de Rocheprise                5,207,960                May             
          4, 1993                                                                     
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007