THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEVIN D. WINNER
____________
Appeal No. 97-3194
Application No. 08/442,8161
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 3, 4, 6, 9 to 24, 31 to 38 and 44 to 46,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed May 17, 1995. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 08/233,291, filed April 26, 1994, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,488,844.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007