THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 51
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte VOICHI TOKAI and MASASHI SAHASHI
________________
Appeal No. 96-1367
Application No. 07/804,5011
________________
HEARD: June 10, 1999
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 10-
18, 28, 29, 34-36 and 55, all the claims remaining in the
present application. Claim 10 is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed December 10, 1991.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/536,083, filed June 11, 1990; which is
a continuation of Application No. 07/305,169, filed
February 2, 1989; both which are abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007