Paper No. 43
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ELWYN P. M. WAKEFIELD,
and CHRISTOPHER P.H. WALKER
______________
Appeal No. 96-2243
Application 08/327,4471
_______________
HEARD: JUNE 9, 1999
_______________
Before KRASS, HECKER and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application for patent filed October 21, 1994. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 08/074,984,
filed June 10, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
07/808,531, filed December 16, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation
of Application 07/557,940, filed July 25, 1990, now Patent No. 5,073,816,
issued December 17, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007