Appeal No. 96-2243
Application 08/327,447
We agree with the Appellants, the pins of Kishida
are not part of the printed circuit, and the printed circuit
is claimed to extend externally of the package. For these
reasons we will not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 102 or 35 U.S.C. §
103 rejections of claim 30, and likewise the rejection of
dependent claims 31 through 33 which contain the same
limitation discussed supra.
Independent claim 34 contains the same limitation as
discussed with regard to claim 30 (i.e. printed circuit which
extends externally of the package), and we will therefore not
sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of this claim.
Likewise, we will not sustain this rejection of dependent
claims 35 through 39 which contain the same limitation.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007