Ex parte THIRUVENGADAM et al. - Page 9

          Appeal No. 1996-2308                                                        
          Application 08/179,008                                                      


               The rejections of claims 1, 3, 5-7, 9, 12 and 13 under 35              
          U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lack of enablement, and                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, for failing to                     
          particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention, are              
          reversed.                                                                   
                                      REVERSED                                        






                         CHUNG K. PAK                  )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         CHARLES F. WARREN             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) INTERFERENCES                
                                                       )                              
                         TERRY J. OWENS                     )                         
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              










                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007