THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KIYOSHI TOYAMA and MASAYUKI TOGAWA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3814
Application No. 08/348,8351
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, ELLIS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claim 2, which is the only claim pending in this
application.
1Application for patent filed November 29, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/073,289, filed June 7, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/784,538, filed
October 29, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007