Appeal No. 1996-3814 Page 16
Application No. 08/348,835
862, 134 USPQ 292, 295 (CCPA 1962) (“We do not think a
rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 should be based on such
speculations and assumptions”). Accordingly, since the
metes and bounds of the claimed invention have not yet been
clarified, the obviousness rejection is improper and should be
reversed.
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOAN ELLIS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
Lane, Aitken & McCann
2600 Virginia Avenue, N.W.,
Suite 901
Washington, DC 20037
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007