Ex parte KAZMIERCZAK et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 97-3469                                                          
          Application 08/188,427                                                      

                    Mowry discloses a dual-gap MR head which faces a                  
               medium 12, as shown in Figs. 3-4, the dual-gap head                    
               having: a write gap 44, 48, 50 (means for writing) which               
               defines a shadow over a track of a recording medium.  The              
               means for writing would include at least the width of the              
               top pole 48 to at most the width of middle magnetic                    
               pole 50 and insulative layer 44 (please see column 4,                  
               lines 50-59).  From this, the writing means defines a                  
               shadow over the track of at least the width of pole 48                 
               and as large as the width of middle pole 50 (as shown in               
               FIG. 4).  Mowry further shows a read gap 52 (means for                 
               reading) which is spaced from the write gap and is                     
               considered to be the middle active portion 72 of the MR                
               element positioned between the contacts 58 (please see                 
               column 4, lines 59-63 along with column 5, lines 18-21).               
               From the description above and FIG. 4, it is considered                
               that the read gap is completely within the "shadow" of                 
               the write gap 44.  Furthermore, since the write gap                    
               shadow is larger than the read gap shadow, Mowry shows an              
               inside buffer area and an outside buffer area.                         
          The examiner's finding that the shadow of the write gap could               
          be "as large as the width of middle pole 50" (EA4) was not                  
          presented in the Examiner's Answer.  Appellants reply as                    
          follows (RBr1-2):                                                           
                    The Examiner's contention that the write gap of                   
               Mowry writes a pattern as wide as middle pole 50 is not                
               supported by Mowry.  Mowry does not state nor suggest                  
               that the flux path between top pole 48 and middle pole 50              
               extends the full width of middle pole 50.  In fact, Mowry              
               never discusses the width of the information actually                  
               written to the track. . . .  The Examiner is merely                    
               guessing that the information written to the track would               
               be as wide as middle pole 50 instead of relying on a                   
               teaching found in Mowry.  Therefore, the statement that                
               the writing means defines a shadow over the track "as                  
               large as the width of middle pole 50" is unsupported by                

                                        - 8 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007