Ex parte MILLARD - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-1928                                                                                     Page 3                        
                 Application No. 08/543,153                                                                                                             


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           
                          The appellant's invention relates to a rotary valve seal                                                                      
                 assembly.  An understanding of the invention can be derived                                                                            
                 from a reading of claims 2 through 14, a copy of which appears                                                                         
                 in the appendix to the appellant's brief.2                                                                                             


                          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                                                         
                 examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                                                         
                 Johnson, Jr.                                 2,631,907                                             Mar. 17,                            
                 1953                                                                                                                                   
                 Storms                                       3,612,545                                             Oct. 12,                            
                 1971                                                                                                                                   
                 Duffy                                        5,165,702                                             Nov. 24,                            
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                         (filed May 20, 1991)                                           



                          Claims 2 through 7, 10, 11 and 14 stand rejected under                                                                        
                 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Storms.                                                                                     






                          2We note that claim 14 does not provide proper antecedent                                                                     
                 basis for "the inner axially extending circumferential face,"                                                                          
                 "the ring member," "the resilient ring member," and "the                                                                               
                 groove bottom."                                                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007