The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TONI DOCKNER, GERHARD NESTLER,
HOLGER HERBST, HELMUT LERMER, HANS MARTAN,
HERBERT VOGEL and HERBERT EXNER
_____________
Appeal 1997-1635
Application 08/319,6671
______________
Before: WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges, and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of the Primary Examiner
rejecting claims 1-10. We affirm.
Application for patent filed 7 October 1994. Applicants claim priority under1
35 U.S.C. § 119 of German patent application P 43 35 172.7, filed 15 October 1993. The
real party in interest is BASF Aktiengesellschaft.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007