Ex parte RALEIGH et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 1997-3390                                                        
          Application No. 08/354,384                                                  

               In view of the analysis above, we find no reason or                    
          suggestion for combining Santangelo and Merz.  We further find              
          that one of ordinary skill in the art would not have                        
          reasonably used a process of flame sprayed metallization for                
          metal substrates as taught by Merz for forming a metal layer                
          on back of a semiconductor substrate as disclosed by                        
          Santangelo.  We note that the other independent claim 15                    
          recites the step of flame spraying a metal layer on the back                
          surface of a semiconductor wafer similar to claim 8.                        
          Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claims 8 through 20                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Santangelo and Merz.                             


















                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007