Ex parte NAKATANI et al. - Page 7




           Appeal No. 1997-3662                                                                  
           Application No. 07/964,342                                                            


                 After careful review of the Preuss reference, in light of                       
           the arguments of record, we are in agreement with Appellants’                         
           position as stated in the Brief.  We note that the relevant                           
           portion of independent claim 1 recites:2                                              
                           coding the image data by replacing the                               
                      image data with codewords indicative of a white                            
                      run-length or a black run-length,                                          
                            representing color information of a color                            
                      other than white or black by combining specific                            
                      codewords among said codewords, . . .                                      
                 We find no disclosure in Preuss that would teach the                            
           specifics of this claim language.  We agree with Appellants                           
           that the claimed invention involves more than the mere                                
           substitution of one color for another as suggested by the                             
           Examiner.  Moreover, we find that no suggestion exists in                             
           Preuss for combining black and white codewords to produce                             
           color image data other than black or white.  Further, the                             
           Examiner has provided no indication as to how and in what                             
           manner the disclosure of Preuss would be modified to arrive at                        
           the claimed invention.  In our view, the only reason on the                           
           record for the skilled artisan to modify Preuss in the manner                         


                 2Similar recitations appear in each of the other appealed                       
           independent claims 5, 9, 13, and 18.                                                  
                                               7                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007