Ex parte NAKATANI et al. - Page 8




           Appeal No. 1997-3662                                                                  
           Application No. 07/964,342                                                            


           suggested by the Examiner would be through impermissible                              
           hindsight reconstruction of Appellants’ invention.  The mere                          
           fact that the prior art may be modified in the manner                                 
           suggested by                                                                          
           the Examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the                        
           prior art suggested the desirability of the modification.                             
           In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266 n.14, 23 USPQ2d 1780,                               
           1783-84 n.14 (Fed. Cir. 1992).                                                        























                                               8                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007