Ex parte CASPER et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1997-4125                                      Page 12           
          Application No. 08/261,523                                                  


          bus.  Rather than phase-aligning data bits to a clock signal,               
          Murakami’s device phase-aligns a frame signal to a frame                    
          synchronous signal.  Specifically, the “invention provides a                
          device for phase-aligning an input time-division multiplexed                
          signal having an input clock signal to an output frame                      
          synchronous signal synchronized with an output clock signal                 
          different from the input clock signal to produce an output                  
          frame signal ....”  Col. 2, ll. 63-68.                                      


               Because the references do not teach phase-aligning data                
          bits to a clock signal, we are not persuaded that teachings                 
          from the prior art would appear to have suggested the claimed               
          limitation of phase-aligning data bits transmitted on lines of              
          a bus with respect to a clock signal transmitted along with                 
          the data on another line of the bus.  The examiner has                      
          impermissibly relied on the appellants’ teachings or                        
          suggestions; he has not established a prima facie case of                   
          obviousness.  Therefore, we reverse the rejections of claims                
          1-3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                                               










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007