Appeal No. 1998-0750
Application 08/232,135
The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of
obviousness are:
Kanayama 4,897,639 Jan. 30, 1990
Fukuoka et al. (Fukuoka) 5,111,195 May 05, 1992
Kumar et al. (Kumar) 5,449,970 Sep. 12, 1995
Claims 4 and 61-63 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Kanayama.
Claims 1 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Kanayama and Kumar.
Claims 7, 11-13, 17, 18, 24, 25, 28, 29, 32-35, 47, 48, 50
and 53-60 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable
over Fukuoka.
Claims 9, 10, 16, 19, 20, 27 and 49 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Fukuoka and Kumar.
Claims 15, 21, 22, 30, 38-42, 45, 46 and 51 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Fukuoka and
Kanayama.
Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Kanayama and Fukuoka.
Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Kanayama, Kumar and Fukuoka.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007