Appeal No. 1998-0750
Application 08/232,135
The respective positions of the examiner and the appellants
with regard to the propriety of these rejections are set forth in
the final rejection (Paper No. 11) and the examiner’s answer
(Paper No. 16) and the appellants’ brief (Paper No. 13).
Appellants’ Invention
An adequate description of the invention is set forth at
pages 2 and 3 of the brief.
The Prior Art
In Figures 1 and 2, Kanayama discloses a system for producing
uniformity of screen brightness in a matrix display panel having a
diode structure 3-5. Light intensity of a first pixel within the
display panel is measured and the intensity of a second pixel
within the display panel is compensated as a function of the
measured light intensity of the first pixel.
In Figure 1, Fukuoka discloses a circuit for regulating
voltage applied to a pixel at electrode 102. A differential
amplifier 1 compares a first voltage fed back to the negative
terminal of element 1 to a video signal input at 6. When the
voltage V appearing at the output terminal 13 of the differential
G
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007