Ex Parte HARTMANN et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for 
                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.              
                                                                    Paper No. 20          
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                       ____________                                       
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                       ____________                                       
                       Ex parte CURTIS HARTMANN and OSMAN A. DUMAN                        
                                       ____________                                       
                                   Appeal No. 2000-1250                                   
                                Application No. 08/662,077                                
                                       ____________                                       
                                         ON BRIEF1                                        
                                       ____________                                       
          Before HAIRSTON, BLANKENSHIP, and LEVY, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                         
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                              


                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                    
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                
          examiner's final rejection2 of claims 1-15, which are all of the                
          claims pending in this application.                                             



               1 The Oral Hearing scheduled for March 21, 2002 was waived by appellants   
          in a communication received, via fascimile transmission, on March 15, 2002.     
               2 An amendment (Paper No. 12, filed October 25, 1999) filed concurrently   
          with the brief, has been entered by the examiner.  As a result of the           
          amendment, the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second and fourth paragraphs,  
          have been withdrawn by the examiner (answer, page 2).                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007