Appeal No. 2000-1250
Application No. 08/662,077 Page 12
and Astmann. The combined teachings of the references do not
teach or suggest that the object server includes a generic
message interpreter, and that the API includes a set of generic
messages for controlling the plurality of different high speed
telecommunication switches, each of which responds to a different
set of native messages. We therefore find that the examiner has
failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness of claim
11, and claims 12-15 which depend therefrom. Accordingly, the
rejection of claims 11-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007