Appeal No. 2000-1888
Application No. 08/885,984
respect to claims 19-22, 26, 38-41 and 45. We also find that
McAteer does not anticipate claim 3, which recites limitations
similar to those of claim 19. Accordingly, we sustain the
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 18 and 37 over Lundgren,
McAteer and Baumhauer but not of claims 19-22, 26, 38-41 and 45.
We also cannot sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) rejection of claim
3 over McAteer.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007