Ex Parte MARKOW et al - Page 15




          Appeal No.  2000-1888                                                        
          Application No.  08/885,984                                                  


                                      CONCLUSION                                       
               In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner                  
          rejecting claims 1, 5, 32-36, 42-44 and 46-50 under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 102 and rejecting claims 1, 2, 4-18, 23-25, 27-31 and 37 under             
          35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.  The decision of the Examiner                   
          rejecting claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and rejecting claims 19-             
          22, 26, 38-41 and 45 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                      
               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                      
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                     
          § 1.136(a).                                                                  
                                   AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    





                         KENNETH W. HAIRSTON            )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        )                              
                                                        ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         ANITA PELLMAN GROSS            )     APPEALS                  
                         Administrative Patent Judge    )       AND                    













Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007