Ex Parte MALHOTRA - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2002-0699                                                         
          Application No. 09/401,740                                                   


          carboxaldehyde, phenanthrene carboxaldehyde,                                 
          2-fluorenecarboxaldehyde, poly ((phenyl glycidyl                             
          ether)-co-formaldehyde), poly ((@-cresyl glycidyl ether)-co-                 
          formaldehyde), poly (D-toluenesulfonamide-co-formaldehyde), or               
          mixtures thereof.                                                            
                                     REFERENCES                                        
               The examiner relies on the following prior art reference:               
          Ball                                4,684,956      Aug.  4, 1987             
          Bruder et al. (Bruder)              5,015,292      May  14, 1991             
          Yaegashi et al. (Yaegashi)          5,270,730      Dec. 14, 1993             
          Takazawa et al. (Takazawa)          5,279,655      Jan. 18, 1994             
          Tobias et al. (Tobias)              5,286,288      Feb. 15, 1994             
          Fujioka                             5,397,388      Mar. 14, 1995             
          Wickramanayake                      5,531,816      Jul.  2, 1996             
          Malhotra et al. (Malhotra ‘390)     5,902,390      May  11, 1999             
          Malhotra et al. (Malhotra ‘117)     5,922,117      Jul. 13, 1999             
          Nishizaki et al. (Nishizaki)        6,022,910      Feb.  8, 2000             
          Shawcross et al. (Shawcross)        6,028,180      Feb. 22, 2000             
          Breton et al. (Breton ‘607)         6,045,607      Apr.  4, 2000             
          Breton et al. (Breton ‘599)         6,106,599      Aug. 22, 2000             
          Shimomura                           06-228476      Aug. 16, 1994             
          (Published Japanese Patent Application)                                      


                                      REJECTIONS                                       
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                          
          (1) Claims 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 through 14, 16, 21 and 22 under 35                 
               U.S.C. § 103, as unpatentable over the disclosure of                    
               Takazawa;                                                               
          (2)  Claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the                  
               combined disclosures of Takazawa and Nishizaki;                         
          (3) Claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the                   

                                          4                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007