Ex Parte Holcomb et al - Page 13




                      Appeal No. 2004-0140                                                                                                       
                      Application No. 10/154,729                                                                                                 

                      not entitled under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to the benefit of the earlier filing date of this                                       
                      provisional application.                                                                                                   
                              We affirm  the Examiner’s §§ 102 and 103 rejections since the claims on                                            
                      appeal are not entitled under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to the benefit of the earlier filing date                                    
                      of this provisional application and Appellants have failed to otherwise address the                                        
                      §§ 102 and 103 rejections.  The rejections of claims 27 to 32 and 34 under 35                                              
                      U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Kulkarni; and claims 27 to 34 under 35 U.S.C.                                            
                      § 103(a) as obvious over the combination of Kulkarni and Shimomuki are affirmed.                                           




















                                                                     -13-                                                                        




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007