Ex Parte Cannata et al - Page 2



              Appeal No. 2006-1049                                                                                       
              Application No. 09/667,826                                                                                 

                              DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134                                                   
                     The Examiner has rejected claims 1, 5, 21, 22, 40, 42, and 48 of the reissue                        
              application on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated.                                       
                     The Examiner has rejected claims 6, 7, 12, 13, 15, 19, 24, 25, 44-47, and 50                        
              of the reissue application on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being obvious.                            
                     The Examiner has rejected claims 40-50 and 52-58 of the reissue application                         
              on appeal as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 251 based on recapture.                                  
                     The Examiner has rejected claims 40-50 and 52-58 of the reissue application                         
              on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as failing to meet the written                           
              description requirement.                                                                                   
                     With respect to the rejections under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(b), 103(a), § 112, and                        
              § 251, the panel reverses the decision of the Examiner.                                                    











                                                          - 2 -                                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007