Ex Parte Aleles et al - Page 11



             Appeal No. 2006-2248                                                                               
             Application No. 10/158,618                                                                         

                          34. In the amendment, Applicants do not make any statement about                      
             newly added claim 11.                                                                              
                          35. A telephonic interview took place on January 20, 2000.                            
                          36. The interview summary (January 20, 2000) shows:                                   
                   The Examiner informed the attorney of record that the application is in                      
                   condition for allowance [subject] to the cancellation of claims 1-10.  The                   
                   attorney of record authorized the Examiner to cancel claims 1-10 and amend                   
                   claim 11 by Examiner’s amendment in order to place the application in                        
                   condition for allowance.                                                                     
                          37. Claim 11 was amended by Examiner’s amendment as shown in                          
             Appendix 3 and the original application was then allowed.                                          
















                                                     - 11 -                                                     




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007