Appeal 2006-3369
Application 10/224,309
materials” viewed in light of the specification clearly fit the reference’s
“soft” resources, which encompass many of the claimed documentary
materials used to support a person in a specific position in an organization.
Granting access to such material will certify their use for policy compliance
by those with roles using those materials. A certification form can be one of
those materials when it is used to itemize the resources that are due to that
person.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Appellant has failed to establish that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claims 1 to 45 under 35 USC § 102(e). Claims 1 to 45 are not patentable.
DECISION
The Examiner's rejection of claims 1-45 is Affirmed.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013