The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte FRANCES JIANG, GOPAL KUMAR, APARAJITA MISRA, and
GANAPATHY SUNDARAM
____________________
Appeal 2007-0036
Application 10/699,452
Technology Center 2600
____________________
Decided: May 1, 2007
____________________
Before: HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, JAY P. LUCAS, and MARC S.
HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
of claims 1-17. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Appellants’ invention relates to a method of indicating to a wireless
data communication service subscriber the time delay associated with
gaining access to the wireless network.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013