Appeal No. 2007-0054
Application No. 08/846,722
OTHER ISSUE
The application includes two claims 29. If this application is subject
to further prosecution, the second claim 29 should be re-numbered as
claim 30, with subsequent claims re-numbered accordingly. 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.126.
SUMMARY
The Examiner’s position is supported by the preponderance of the
evidence of record. We therefore affirm the rejection of claims 1-6, 8-18,
and 27-31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Donald E. Adams )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Eric B. Grimes )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Nancy J. Linck )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EBG/MLM/lbg
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013