The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte HOLGER NOLTE, CAMILLA HORST,
MARC HOFFMAN and WERNER POSCH
__________________
Appeal 2007-0563
Application 10/001,9401
Technology Center 2100
________________
Decided: May 22, 2007
________________
Before: JAMESON LEE, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and
SALLY C. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. Statement of the Case
2 Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
3 claims 1-38. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
4 The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on
5 appeal is:
1 Application for patent filed 29 November 2001. The real party in interest
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013