The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FRANCIS Y. F. LEE
__________
Appeal 2007-1033
Application 10/091,061
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided June 19, 2007
__________
Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, ERIC GRIMES, and
NANCY J. LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
Opinion by GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. Dissenting opinion by
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method
of treating cancer. The Examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We
have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The Specification describes a “method for the treatment of anti-
proliferative diseases, including cancer, which comprises administering to a
mammalian specie in need thereof a synergistically, therapeutically effective
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013