The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________________
Ex parte ROBERT P. MEAGLEY,
MICHAEL D. GOODNER, E. STEVE PUTNA,
SHAN C. CLARK, and WANG YUEH
____________________
Appeal 2007-2417
Application 10/688,521
Technology Center 1700
____________________
Decided: August 8, 2007
____________________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and JAMES
T. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. Statement of the Case
This ex parte appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) is from a rejection of
claims 1, 3, and 6-12 of Application 10/688,521.
We affirm the Examiner’s rejection.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013