Ex Parte Meagley et al - Page 2


                  Appeal 2007-2417                                                                                         
                  Application 10/688,521                                                                                   

                         The Application was filed on 17 October 2003.  The real party in                                  
                  interest is said to be Intel Corporation (Appeal Br. 3).                                                 
                         The following U.S. patents are relied upon by the Examiner:                                       
                         Name   Patent No. Issue Date  Filing Date                                                         
                         Hallock et al . 6,582,891 24 Jun. 2003 14 Nov. 2000                                               
                         Hallock et al. 6,709,807 23 Mar. 2004 09 Oct. 2002                                                

                         The following published U.S. patent application is relied upon by the                             
                  Examiner:                                                                                                
                         Name   Pub. No.  Pub. Date Filing Date                                                            
                         Verhaverbeke 2004/019066A1 7 Oct. 2004 21 Mar. 2004                                               

                         The following ground of rejection is appealed:                                                    
                         Claims 1, 3, and 6-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being                               
                  unpatentable over the Hallock et al. patents (Hallock) in view of the                                    
                  Verhaverbeke published application (Verhaverbeke).                                                       
                         In this decision, we refer to the Applicants Meagley et al. as                                    
                  “Meagley”.                                                                                               
                  II. Findings of Fact                                                                                     
                         The record supports the following findings of fact as well as any other                           
                     findings of fact set forth in this decision by a preponderance of the                                 
                     evidence.                                                                                             
                         1. The “invention relates generally to semiconductor processing and,                              
                            particularly, to the formation of photoresists.”  (Specification 1).                           



                                                            2                                                              

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013