Appeal 2007-2460
Application 10/709,179
DECISION
ORDERED that the Examiner’s rejection of claims 15, 16 and 18
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Ono is affirmed.
FURTHER ORDERED that the Examiner’s rejection of claims 17 and
19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ono as applied to
claims 15-16 and further in view of Akram is affirmed.
FURTHER ORDERED that the Examiner’s rejection of claim 20
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ono as applied to
claims 15-16 and further in view of Koh is affirmed.
AFFIRMED
(37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b) (2006)
cc (via U.S. Mail):
JIANQ CHYUN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE
7 FLOOR-1, NO. 100
ROOSEVELT ROAD, SECTION 2
TAIPEI 100 TW TAIWAN
16
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Last modified: September 9, 2013