Ex parte WEI H. CHANG, et al. - Page 1

                                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                         
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                
                for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                               
                                                                                                    Paper No. 14                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                           Ex parte WEI H. CHANG, SHAW-CHANG                                                                  
                                             CHU and JAMES A. JOHNSON, Jr.                                                                    
                                                        Appeal No. 94-2995                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/976,8271                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and GARRIS and                                                               
                WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                    
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    

                         This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the                                                              
                examiner to allow claims 1, 3 through 8 and 10 through 17 as                                                                  
                amended subsequent to the final rejection.  The only other claim                                                              
                remaining in the application, which is claim 9, stands withdrawn                                                              
                from further consideration by the examiner.                                                                                   

                         1   Application for patent filed November 16, 1992.                                                                  

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007