THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JIN-SU PARK
____________
Appeal No. 95-1187
Application 08/024,495
____________
HEARD: 9 June 1997
____________
Before HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
Nature of the appeal
1. The subject application for patent was filed 1 March
1993. (Paper 1 at 1.)
2. Applicant claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of
Korean patent application number 88-18099, filed 31 December
1988. Applicant also claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of
United States patent application numbers 07/398,927, filed
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007