Ex parte HAL H. OTTESEN, et al. - Page 11





            Appeal No. 95-1308                                                                                                     
            Application 07/999,502                                                                                                 

            stored in a record for later analysis.  The references deal with real time monitoring and control, e.g.,               
            Gaudet triggers control circuitry to stop the disk drive operation whenever head crash conditions are                  
            detected and Smith generates a write fault signal to stop writing of the read/write heads when the                     
            external force is in excess of a predetermined threshold.  The examiner points to no suggestion in the                 
            references of storing the claimed physical operation conditions.  If there was any suggestion of storing               
            one of the operating conditions for error analysis, it would be possible to analogize this to other                    
            operating conditions; however, we find no such suggestion, nor has the examiner pointed to any in                      
            the record.                                                                                                            
                    The examiner concludes (Examiner's Answer, page 6):                                                            
                           It would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having                        
                    ordinary skill in the art to provide the combination system of Coale and Chang et al. with each                
                    of parameters the art has recognized to be indicative of the physical configuration of the disk                
                    file; including temperature (Kaida), vibration (Smith), power supply (Fukushima et al.), and                   
                    flying height (Gaudet et al.); in order to provide a reliable, composite indication to the                     
                    combination system to provide one with all the information concerning the physical                             
                    configuration of a disk file in order to diagnose the system to find a way to correct for an                   
                    error.                                                                                                         
            It is not sufficient to be able to make up a plausible reason for the combination.  While the admitted                 
            prior art driver may be capable of being modified to work the way appellants' apparatus is claimed,                    
            there must be a suggestion or motivation in (or from) the references to do so.  See In re Mills, 916                   
            F.2d 680, 682, 16 USPQ2d 1430, 1432 (Fed. Cir. 1990) ("While Mathis' apparatus may be capable                          
            of being modified to run the way Mills' apparatus is claimed, there must be a suggestion or motivation                 
            in the reference to do so."); In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir.                          
            1984) ("The mere fact that the prior art could be so modified would not have made the modification                     
                                                          - 11 -                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007