Paper No. 11
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ROBIN B. SOMERVILLE
AND LIANG-TSENG FAN
______________
Appeal No. 95-1668
Application 07/948,0891
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s rejection of claims
1 and 3-18, which are all of the claims remaining in the
application. Claim 14 is illustrative and reads as follows:
Application for patent filed September 18, 1992. According to1
applicants, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/644,192 filed January 22, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007