THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte THOMAS P. ROGERS
________________
Appeal No. 95-2909
Application 08/048,2701
________________
HEARD: August 4, 1997
________________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and 5
to 7. The other claims in the application, 2 to 4 and 8 to 10,
are indicated by the examiner as being allowable if rewritten in
independent form.
1Application for patent filed April 14, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007