Ex parte GAIL S. BAZZANO - Page 1

                                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                         
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written                                                
                for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                               
                                                                                                    Paper No. 25                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                   Ex parte GAIL S. BAZZANO                                                                   
                                                        Appeal No. 95-4713                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/856,1571                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and GRON, Administrative Patent                                                              
                WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                         

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    

                         This appeal was taken from the examiner’s rejection of                                                               
                claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 16, which are all of the claims                                                              
                remaining in the application.                                                                                                 

                                                      REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM                                                                    

                         1   Application for patent filed January 21, 1992.                                                                   

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007