THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN HARRINGTON
____________
Appeal No. 96-0919
Application 08/027,9221
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 54 and 55.
Claims 1 through 6, 10 through 12, 14, 32 through 35, 50 and 51,
the only other claims pending in the application, stand allowed.
The invention relates to “a combined trash and recycling
center” (specification, page 1). Claims 54 and 55 read as
follows:
1Application for patent filed March 8, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
07/737,330, filed July 29, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007