THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte E. PAUL SHANNON
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0998
Application 08/180,2881
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HARKCOM, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and KRASS
and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1, 4,
5, and 7-18, constituting all the claims remaining in the
application.2
We affirm.
1Application for patent filed January 12, 1994.
2Claims 2, 3, and 6 were canceled by amendment. Claim 19
was withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a
non-elected invention. Office action dated December 2, 1994
(Paper No. 8) at 2, paragraph 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007