THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte HEE K. YOON and EDWARD L. CHO _____________ Appeal No. 96-1100 Application 07/836,0321 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 8, which constitute all of the claims of record in the application. 1Application for patent filed February 14, 1992. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007