Appeal No. 96-1534 Application 07/888,991 from the examiner's rejection of claims 25-30, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. The claimed invention pertains to a method for optimizing the access of information stored in a database file. Representative claim 28 is reproduced as follows: 28. A method for optimizing the access of information stored in a database file, the method comprising: (a) entering a query condition; and (b) accessing the specified information by any one of: (1) referencing an index if one satisfying the query condition exists or can be created; (2) referencing an index if one defining a range of records exists or can be created; and (3) filtering records not meeting the condition as they are accessed if (1) and (2) are not possible, or if the database file is below a pre-selected size. The examiner relies on the following references: Kuechler et al. (Kuechler) 4,811,199 Mar. 07, 1989 Li et al. (Li) 5,265,246 Nov. 23, 1993 (effectively filed Dec. 10, 1990) Claims 28-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Li. Claims 25-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Kuechler. In the examiner’s answer a new ground of rejection was entered against claims 25-30 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Kuechler. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007