Ex parte JOHN R. HALE, et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-2391                                                          
          Application 08/002,286                                                      


          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-20, which constitute              
          all the claims in the application.                                          
          The claimed invention pertains to a cathode sheath for                      
          use in a thermionic electron-gun cathode.                                   
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  A cathode sheath for a thermionic electron-gun cathode,            
          the sheath being substantially in the form of a hollow cylinder             
          having an outer surface and an inner surface, a central axis, a             
          closed end and an axially-opposite open end, and a side wall                
          extending between the closed end and the open end, the sheath               
          comprising a continuous bimetallic laminate having a first layer            
          of material forming the inner surface and a second layer of                 
          electron-emissive material overlying substantially the entirety             
          of the first layer and forming the outer surface, the laminate              
          having a preselected thickness at the closed end and having a               
          thickness at the side wall which varies along the central axis.             
          The examiner relied on the following references in the                      
          final rejection:                                                            
          Larson                        3,214,626          Oct. 26, 1965              
          Opresko                       4,554,479          Nov. 19, 1985              
                                                                                     
          The examiner applied the following additional references                    
          in new grounds of rejection set forth in the examiner’s answer:             
          Buescher et al. (Buescher)    3,974,414          Aug. 10, 1976              
          Falce et al. (Falce)          5,218,263          June 08, 1993              
          (filed Aug. 08, 1991)                                                       
          Hale et al. (Hale)            5,422,536          June 06, 1995              
          (filed Aug. 03, 1993)                                                       
          The admitted prior art.                                                     


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007