THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HEINZ-GERD SMOLKA,
KLAUS LEHMANN, HANS HAWEL,
DIETER SCHRAML AND KLAUS HORNFECK
__________
Appeal No. 96-3172
Application 08/328,3351
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, CAROFF and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
9 to 12 and 14, all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed October 24, 1994.
According to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application 08/142,646, filed October 25, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/848,993, filed April
20, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007