CRAIN et al. V. LUTHER - Page 2




          Interference No. 103,530                                                      




                                    FINAL DECISION                                      
               Now comes the senior party Leroy D. Luther, with a                       
          concession of priority, which is treated as a request for entry               
          of adverse judgment under 37 CFR § 1.662(a).  Accordingly, the                
          following judgment is entered.                                                
                                       JUDGMENT                                         
               Judgment in the above-noted interference is entered against              
          the senior party, Leroy D. Luther.  Leroy D. Luther is not                    
          entitled to his patent claims 1 through 13, which claims                      
          correspond to the count in interference.  Judgment is entered                 
          in favor of the junior party, Jack L. Crain, Randell Gray, and                
          Melvin D. Colclasure.  Jack L. Crain, Randell Gray, and Melvin D.             
          Colclasure are entitled to a patent containing claims 1 through 8             
          and 21 through 26, which claims correspond to the count in                    
          interference.                                                                 



               William F. Pate, III            )                                        
               Administrative Patent Judge     )                                        
                    )                                                                   
                                                   )                                    
                                                   )                                    
                         JOHN C. Martin                  ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         Administrative Patent Judge     )   APPEALS AND                
                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                     
                                           2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007