JUDGMENT
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 134
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
HUGH A. THOMPSON and EDWARD H. KRAUTTER
Junior Party1
v.
BOBBY M. PHILLIPS, SHRIRAM BARGRODIA, WILLIAM A. HAILE,
HARRY P. HALL, DAVID A. CASEY, J. NELSON DALTON,
RONNIE J. JONES, RONALD S. SCALF, RICHARD D. NEAL,
LEWIS C. TRENT and JACK L. NELSON
Senior Party2
_____________
Patent Interference No. 103,601
______________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, CAROFF and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
1Application 07/773,164, filed October 8, 1991, now U.S.
Patent No 5,200,248, issued April 6, 1993, which is a
continuation of application 07/428,446, filed February 20,
1990, now abandoned.
2Application 07/736,267, filed July 23, 1991, which is
according to appellants, a continuation-in-part of application
07/333,651, issued April 4, 1989, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007