THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TSE W. CHANG and NANCY T. CHANG
__________
Appeal No. 93-3529
Application 07/785,5651
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before CAROFF, GRON and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and
2, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claim 1
1Application for patent filed November 4, 1991. According
to the appellants this application is a division of Application
07/455,080, filed December 22, 1989, now U.S. Patent 5,089,603,
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/369,479, filed
June 21, 1989, now U.S. Patent 5,079,344.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007